the conflict zen® blogsubscribe now

Introducing the conflict pivot

conflict pivot
A pivot is a change of direction and, therefore, focus. Since most people in conflict focus attention in ways that get them stuck, freedom from a conflict means pivoting in three key ways.

Many of you know I’ve been working on my second book. Its working title is The Conflict Pivot. And today I’m going to introduce you to the Conflict Pivot framework.

In business, a pivot is a strategic change in a company’s direction, motivated by opportunity for greater success. In basketball, a pivot is a rotation to face another direction, motivated by a desire to pass or shoot the ball with greater success. In conflict, a pivot follows the same idea: Change the direction you’re focusing in order to achieve both a better outcome and peace of mind.

Pivots don’t mean that you must forget the past and ignore what has happened. Silicon Valley entrepreneur Eric Ries, credited with popularizing pivots as part of successful entrepreneurs’ business strategy, says this about pivots: “…successful startups change directions but stay grounded in what they’ve learned. They keep one foot in the past and place one foot in a new possible future.” Similarly, the conflict pivot doesn’t require you to dismiss the past as though it did not happen, but instead invites you to place your attention where it will matter: What will happen from here forward.

Conflict Pivot 1: Toward your reaction, not their behavior

What’s your stuck story? Like a movie trailer, your stuck story of the conflict is a montage of the most interesting moments, with certain scenes magnified and others omitted. It’s not the story of the conflict; it’s your story of the conflict.

The first pivot is to turn your attention away from their behavior and toward your stuck story’s influence on your own.

→ Recognize that you have a stuck story.
→ Detect its impact on your behavior in the conflict.
→ Identify what you dwell on and react to most in your stuck story.

Conflict Pivot 2: Toward the hooks, not the story

Why do you care? Conflict occurs when something important feels threatened. The things you’re dwelling on and reacting to most are hints about the true source of your unease.

The second pivot is to turn your attention away from your stuck story and toward understanding why you’re hooked.

→ Investigate the link between what you dwell on and what’s important to you.
→ Identify the perceived threat.
→ Discern your personal hooks and ways they influence you.

Conflict Pivot 3: Toward the future, not the past

What will you do about it? Conflict thrives in the unknowable past and in your reliance on the other to set things right. Face forward and take back your power to find real freedom from a conflict.

The third pivot is to turn your attention away from what’s happened and toward what’s next.

→ Uncover options for freeing yourself from the ways the conflict has hooked you.
→ Consider solutions that you can act on without relying on the other.
→ Rewrite the story of your future.

For most, the toughest part of pivoting is freeing yourself from the habits of mind that have kept the conflict stuck. Those old habits are like well-worn clothing, comfortable and familiar, even if threadbare or ill-fitting. As with the change of any other habit, your commitment to creating a new habit, along with a few key attitudes and actions, will be the key to success.

I’ll be writing more about conflict pivots here and there over the coming months and will have a worksheet available for download soon. Tell me…what do you think of the idea? Leave a comment with your thoughts.

About the author

Dr. Tammy Lenski helps individuals and organizations resolve conflict more simply and stay calm in conflict.

  • Claire Miller

    I think that the idea of pivot is a great metaphor about what occurs in deep-rooted conflict. As such, this concept can both help an individual understand the underlying reasons for being stuck and be a great tool to liberate the individual from the binds that lock him/her in the conflict. I have worked in Human Resources for many years and have witnessed individuals–employees and leaders alike–hold onto the conflict to the point that they become self-destructive. This tool appears to have great potential to help them reframe their outlook so that the conflict can be resolved more elegantly and with less pain to all. I would love to read more, and look forward to your upcoming posts and book!

    • http://lenski.com/ Tammy Lenski

      Claire, thanks so much for taking the time to comment! I have worked with a lot of HR managers over the years and have seen what you’ve experienced and described here. These experiences definitely helped shape my thinking and my work on this. Now I’ve got to put my nose to the grindstone and finish the book!

  • http://www.michaeltoebe.com Michael Toebe

    “Those old habits are like well-worn clothing, comfortable and familiar, even if threadbare or ill-fitting.”

    How well written and true.

    No matter how painful, disabling and destructive, conflict is certainly familiar and for some, operating outside that contaminated circle is too frightening to conceive. They can feel some sort of control within a conflict while management or resolution is the unknown, and that means it a changed reality, in their eyes, could be far worse.

    Changing thoughts and thus attitudes and behaviors are the tasks we are called to perform as human beings. If we resist, we stay stuck. If we show courage, and it does take courage, then a new, healthier beginning is not only possible but far more likely. Freedom from conflict doesn’t come free or cheap.

    • http://lenski.com/ Tammy Lenski

      Michael, I agree…being stuck in conflict can, in some ways, serve someone well because it feels like a familiar place. Freedom, however, can be cheap indeed — a lot less effort sometimes, at no real cost to use other than the courage to pivot.

  • Kerri Schmitt

    Tammy I appreciate your metaphor and have used a variation of this for years in mediation. I first begin with setting a context for the conversation as it creates a space for relatedness, accountability and forgiveness. I find it helpful if parties in conflict examine their story as a reference point that helped them make sense of confusing and often hurtful situations. Their perception while true for them is only a piece of the broader truth. We all attach to pieces of our story that serve us. When we tell the story to friends and family what we often hear in their responses are only the pieces that fit in to our viewpoint. The key here is to differentiate between the stories that help us find our voice and give meaning to our lives and those that limit possibility. The second part to this is examining what we believe to be the intention behind a behavior. We often attribute a negative intention to an observed behavior that has caused us harm. We believe this to be unfair and thus are justified in our anger. Your third point is really about possibilities and moving the conversation from what happened to what is now possible. All of these transitions are guided with powerful questions. I’ve found Peter Block’s work to be extremely helpful in the art of asking questions. Great job in finding a way to package these concepts in an easy to understand format! I look forward to your new book.

    • http://lenski.com/ Tammy Lenski

      Hi, Kerri – The process you describe sounds like it’s quite a bit different than the one I’ve developed, though the two have the use of story in common to be sure. Peter Block is a wonderful resource — I’ve used his books in a number of my grad classes over the years. Thanks for takin the time to share your thoughts…it sounds like you’re doing great work out there!

  • http://www.conflictcalming Karen Bray

    I like the metaphor of a pivot. I was aiming at a similar concept when I named my “48hour conflict turnaround programme” – the notion that we can choose to change direction from escalation to resolution, independently of the other party. It arose from the idea that relying on the other party to agree to mediation is too limited – individuals can be supported to change the direction of a conflict themselves (perhaps engaging the other party in constructive problem-solving as a result).
    I love the elegance of using the stuck story itself as a gateway to finding out what really matters and moving forward.

    • http://lenski.com/ Tammy Lenski

      Karen, it sounds like you’ve been exploring along some parallel lines, including the limitations of mediation. Lovely to hear that other good minds are pondering some of the same questions!

  • Pingback: Please help me choose my book's subtitle | Tammy Lenski

  • Pingback: Conflict resolution can be a solo act

  • Pingback: Musings on the mediator's job